DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTION Sample Clauses
DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTION. On December 20, 2006, Plaintiff Xxxxx Xxxxx (together with Frenchola Holden and Xxxxx XxXxxxxx) (collectively, the “Named Plaintiffs”) filed this Action against Defendants GMAC Mortgage, LLC (“GMAC Mortgage”), GMAC Bank (now known, and hereinafter referred to, as Ally Bank), and Cap Re of Vermont, LLC (“Cap Re”) (collectively, “Defendants”) (Defendants together with the Named Plaintiffs, the “Parties”). The Action was filed as a proposed class action. Named Plaintiffs allege that the portions of the mortgage insurance premiums that certain non-party private mortgage insurance providers ceded to Cap Re were disguised kickbacks paid for the referral of private mortgage insurance business. Named Plaintiffs allege that Defendants’ conduct violated Section 8 of the federal Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, 12 U.S.C. §§ 2601 et seq. On May 14, 2012, GMAC Mortgage and certain of its affiliates (collectively, the “Debtors”) filed voluntary petitions for relief under chapter 11 of title 11 of the United States Code with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Bankruptcy Court”). Pursuant to an order of the Bankruptcy Court, the Debtors’ chapter 11 cases are being jointly administered and are styled In re Residential Capital, LLC, No. 12- 12020-MG (the “Chapter 11 Cases”). On July 3, 2013, the Debtors and the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors filed that certain Joint Chapter 11 Plan Proposed by Residential Capital, LLC, and the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors (as may be modified, amended or supplemented from time to time, the “Chapter 11 Plan”). On November 19, 2013, the Bankruptcy Court commenced a hearing in connection with confirmation of the Chapter 11 Plan. A copy of the Chapter 11 Plan and related documents is available at xxxxxx.xxx/xxxxxx. Defendants deny all of Named Plaintiffs’ claims and deny any wrongdoing and any liability to Named Plaintiffs or any Class Members, in any amount. Defendants contend that Named Plaintiffs’ claims have no merit and that Defendants would prevail in the Action. Class Counsel have investigated the facts and the applicable law regarding the matters raised in the Action. Class Counsel believe that the issues before the Court are complex and are further complicated by the pending Chapter 11 Cases. Given these complications and the uncertainty as to the outcome of the Action, there is a risk that Named Plaintiffs could recover nothing. Absent the Settlement, the Chapter...
DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTION. 31
2.1. Overall objective, specific objective(s), expected outputs and indicative activities 31
DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTION. 1.1 The Plaintiffs contend that Entertainers performing at the adult clubs doing business as The Library Gentlemen’s Club – Westminster CA; The Library Gentlemen’s Club – Anaheim; and The Library Gentlemen’s Club – Redlands (the “Clubs”) should have been treated as employees rather than as independent contractors and as a result were entitled to but did not receive adequate compensation and benefits in exchange for the services they provided to the Clubs. Plaintiffs further contend, among other things, that Defendants failed to pay overtime, failed to provide meal and rest periods, failed to pay wages, failed to reimburse expenses, failed to provide accurate, itemized wage statements, failed to provide workers compensation insurance, that Defendants were engaged in unlawful tip-sharing arrangements with the Entertainers and that Defendants violated the Private Attorney General Act (“PAGA”) (Cal. Labor Code §§ 2699, et seq.) and Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) (29 U.S. Code §§ 201 et. seq.) Defendants in the Action dispute and deny any The United States District Court for the Central District of California has not ruled on the merits of Plaintiffs’ claims.
DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTION. Give stakeholders and the public an overview of the project, benefits and pilot sites. This video initially planned for previous reporting period should come for the reporting period after the pilots start.
DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTION i print format A4 landscape Estimated eligible 1 costs (per budget category) EU contribution A. Direct personnel costs B. Direct costs of subcontracting [C .Direct costs of financial support] D. Other direct costs E. Indirect costs2 Total costs Reimburse ment rate%3 Maximum EU contribution4 Maximum grant amoun 5t
A.1 Emplyees (or equivalent) A.2 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons [C.1 Financial support] [C.2 Prizes] X.0 Xxxxxx X.0 Xxxxxxxxx X.0 Other goods and services 6 Cost form Actual Actual Unit Actual 7 Flat-rate 7% a b c d e =0,07 * (a + b + d) f = a+ b + c + d + e g h = g * f i 1. [short name partner] [short name affiliated entity not receivingfunding] [short name affiliated entity not receiving EUfunding Total partner 2. [short name partner] [short name affiliatedentity] Total partner X. [short name partner not receiving EU 8 funding] [short name affiliated9entity] Total consortium Action's estimated receipts Income generated by the action Financial contributions given by third parties to the partners Action’s totalreceipts j k l = j+k Additional information Estimated costs of partners/ affiliated entities not receiving EU funding m 1 See Article 5 SGA for the eligibility conditions. 2 The indirect costs claimed must be free of any amounts covered by an operating grant (received under any EU or Euratom funding programme). A partner that receives an operating grant during the duration of the action cannot claim any indirect costs for the year(s) covered by the operating grant (see Article 5.2.E SGA).
DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTION. The purpose of Work Package 6 in the SIMSTAT Pilot ESSnet1 is to evaluate the quality of statistics produced using exchanged dispatch micro data to assess the usability of micro data exchange in a possible future SIMSTAT setup. The Work Package has three objectives:
6.1. Proposal for an analysis plan to evaluate the quality of the statistics to be produced during the ESSnet work. The plan should include both the production of short-term estimates and the production of detailed data
6.2. Compilation and quality evaluation of statistics using the data exchanged during the ESSnet. Each participating Member State should compile and analyse the data concerning their own economy obtained from other Member States.
DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTION. The grant awarded aims at implementing the activities as they are described in the application form: Submitted by: […] For the project whose title is: […] Registered by the Executive Agency under the reference: […] Having received the contract number: […] Any change to the activities needs to be explicitly authorised by the Executive Agency.
DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTION. The purpose of the SIMSTAT-Pilot ESSnet project is for the preparation for exchange of micro-data on intra EU trade between Member States (MS) to enable the exchange of micro data (enterprise level) on intra-EU exports on trade in goods between Member States. So once the data exchange network is operational, the functioning of the system can be tested in a “production like” environment. SIMSTAT-Pilot ESSnet project members will evaluate all MS information on the compilation, production and dissemination of Intrastat trade statistics and find common agreements concerning a number of practical statistical aspects of the project which are common to all participants in the test. These agreements are required to be achieved in order to prepare for conduction the trial exchange of micro data in a coordinated way and to test the future IT system for micro-data exchange. The results of this project will influence the future of SIMSTAT micro data exchange and will be reported to Eurostat and the ESSC. The purpose of Work Package 4 (WP4) is: Designing the production timetable for the trial test adjusted to the production timetables of the MS’s and the current legal framework. The timetable should accommodate the impact of late responses and data corrections. WP4 is split into 3 sub task:
4.1: Draft proposal for the production timetable with regard to the future “production test” context where data transmission network will be used.
4.2: Proposal for the timing and practices of data extractions and data exchange in ESSnet context in order to simulate the future “production test” timetable.
DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTION. Title Title of the action Applicant Name of the institution/organisation responsible for implementing the action Other organisation(s) involved Names Time frame Start and end date of the action
DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTION. The grant is awarded for the action entitled Your Project Title as described in detail in the full proposal to ICDP, see Attachment 1. A budget plan and a provisional time schedule for the execution of the action under the direction of the grantee are given in Attachment 2.