Harmonized System Sample Clauses

Harmonized System. (HS) means the Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System governed by “The International Convention on the Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System”, including its General Rules of Interpretation, Section Notes, and Chapter Notes, and their amendments, as adopted and implemented by the Parties in their respective tariff laws;
Harmonized System. “Harmonized System” means the Harmonized Commodity
Harmonized System. ‘‘Harmonized System’’ means the Harmonized Com- modity Description and Coding System, including its General Rules of Interpre- tation, Section Notes, and Chapter Notes, as adopted and implemented by the Parties in their respective tariff laws;
Harmonized System. One delegation suggested that the Harmonized System (HS) would be a suitable candidate for the reporting of statistics on goods. It was a universal system and was commonly used. In commenting on this suggestion, the point was made that, while the HS was increasingly the standard for customs authorities, the Harmonized System was not suitable for purposes of statistical reporting under the Agreement on Government Procurement because it was too comprehensive. One delegation added that the HS was not a commonly used system to record procurement statistics and that his authorities would find it almost impossible to establish any reliable concordance between the HS and their national system. Another delegation, recalling a study his delegation had undertaken earlier in a different framework, noted that the HS system required reporting either by 21 sections, which did not provide enough detail, or by 98 chapters, providing too much detail. HS was oriented towards commercial items, but did not provide enough details on categories of products typically purchased by governments. Furthermore, implementing HS for procurement purposes would create great difficulties administratively. - UNCPC. One delegation suggested that the UNCPC would be a suitable candidate for the reporting of statistics on services, since it was a universal system and commonly used. One delegation noted that the UNCPC would perhaps be appropriate for reporting services but it would be wholly inadequate for goods. - The point was made that the system of 26 product categories used under the current Agreement sometimes lacked a necessary level of detail to provide meaningful information. It was noted that the US Federal Classification System might have some merit for reporting statistics on goods but that it was probably not adequate for services. The representative of the European Communities mentioned that the CPA, the classification system his authorities had developed for internal use and on which their own procurement information was based, had strong links with the UNCPC. It allowed comparison of public sector procurement with other statistics such as on production and GPA/IC/W/12 on markets in individual countries and could be organized in a way to match other systems. He recognized however that the CPA was a European system and by no means universal. The Working Group requested the Secretariat to prepare a paper on previous discussions held in the Committee on Government Procurement under t...
Harmonized System. Introduction The aim of the HS interface is to enable users to navigate through the Nomenclature, consult and compare the various descriptions (ENs, COs, etc.), look back over the history of the HS and identify the HS code that corresponds to what they are looking for. Content to be displayed in the future HSDB This interface will include: - The HS 2007, HS 2012 and HS 2017 Nomenclatures. Earlier versions will also be added, going as far back as the HS 1988. - Explanatory Notes (HS 2007, HS 2012 and HS 2017) - Classification Opinions (HS 2007, HS 2012 and HS 2017) - Links to rulings - Alphabetical Index (HS 2017) - Commodities (HS 2007 and HS 2012) - Classification advice (option to be confirmed) Volume (for ONE version of the HS and for ONE language) HS version to be showcased Language to be uploaded Electronic format Nomenclature 21 Sections 99 Chapters (2-digit level) 1,244 headings (4-digit level) 5,224 subheadings (6-digit level)1 HS 2017, HS 2012, HS 2007, HS 2002, HS 1996, HS 1992, HS 1988, BN 1976, BN 1955 EN, FR for every version IT for HS 2007, HS 2012 ES for HS 2007, HS 2012, HS 2017 RUS for HS 2007, HS 2012 The same content is available in XML & CSV Explanatory Notes Around 1, 500 Explanatory Notes attached to every heading and to many Chapters Some pictures are attached to the Explanatory Notes HS 2017 HS 2012 HS 2007 Previous version: links to PDFs EN, FR for every version IT for HS 2012 ES for HS 2012, HS 2017 RUS for HS 2012 The content is available in xhtml and xml Classification Opinions Around 1,000 Classification Opinions, mainly at heading level HS 2017 HS 2012 HS 2007 Previous version: links to PDFs EN, FR for every version The content is available in xhtml and xml Alphabetical Index Around 11,000 items + sub- items HS 2017 EN, FR for every version The content is available in xhtml and xml Commodities Around 12,000 items at heading level HS 2007 HS 2012 The content is available in xml The Nomenclature and search engine are for Freemium users (logged users but with no subscriptions to the HS)and visitors. The Explanatory Notes and Classifications Opinions are available to Premium users. Freemium/visitors Nomenclature Search engine and navigation bar (except the facets)
Harmonized System. “Harmonized System (HS)” means the Harmonized Section Notes, and Chapter Notes, as adopted and implemented by the Parties in their respective tariff laws;
Harmonized System. HS Code or HS means the Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System established by the International Convention on the Harmonized Description and Coding System signed at Brussels on 14 June 1983, as amended;

Related to Harmonized System

  • System Upgrades The Connecting Transmission Owner shall procure, construct, install, and own the System Upgrade Facilities and System Deliverability Upgrades described in Attachment 6 of this Agreement. To the extent that design work is necessary in addition to that already accomplished in the Class Year Interconnection Facilities Study for the Interconnection Customer, the Connecting Transmission Owner shall perform or cause to be performed such work. If all the Parties agree, the Interconnection Customer may construct System Upgrade Facilities and System Deliverability Upgrades. 5.2.1 As described in Section 32.3.5.3 of the SGIP in Attachment Z of the ISO OATT, the responsibility of the Interconnection Customer for the cost of the System Upgrade Facilities and System Deliverability Upgrades described in Attachment 6 of this Agreement shall be determined in accordance with Attachment S of the ISO OATT, as required by Section 32.3.5.3.2

  • System Upgrade Facilities and System Deliverability Upgrades Connecting Transmission Owner shall design, procure, construct, install, and own the System Upgrade Facilities and System Deliverability Upgrades described in Appendix A hereto. The responsibility of the Developer for costs related to System Upgrade Facilities and System Deliverability Upgrades shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of Attachment S to the ISO OATT.

  • System Access CUSTOMER agrees to provide to PROVIDER, at CUSTOMER’S expense, necessary access to the mainframe computer and related information technology systems (the “System”) on which CUSTOMER data is processed during the times (the “Service Hours”) specified in the PSAs, subject to reasonable downtime for utility outages, maintenance, performance difficulties and the like. In the event of a change in the Service Hours, CUSTOMER will provide PROVIDER with at least fifteen (15) calendar days written notice of such change.

  • Quality Management System Supplier hereby undertakes, warrants and confirms, and will ensue same for its subcontractors, to remain certified in accordance with ISO 9001 standard or equivalent. At any time during the term of this Agreement, the Supplier shall, if so instructed by ISR, provide evidence of such certifications. In any event, Supplier must notify ISR, in writing, in the event said certification is suspended and/or canceled and/or not continued.

  • System Logging The system must maintain an automated audit trail which can 20 identify the user or system process which initiates a request for PHI COUNTY discloses to 21 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY, 22 or which alters such PHI. The audit trail must be date and time stamped, must log both successful and 23 failed accesses, must be read only, and must be restricted to authorized users. If such PHI is stored in a 24 database, database logging functionality must be enabled. Audit trail data must be archived for at least 3 25 years after occurrence.

  • Network Interconnection Methods 3.1 The Interconnection provided herein may not be used solely for the purpose of originating a Party’s own interexchange traffic.

  • Connectivity User is solely responsible for providing and maintaining all necessary electronic communications with Exchange, including, wiring, computer hardware, software, communication line access, and networking devices.

  • Maintenance Scheduling The NTO shall schedule maintenance of its facilities designated as NTO Transmission Facilities Under ISO Operational Control and schedule any outages (other than forced transmission outages) of said transmission system facilities in accordance with outage schedules approved by the ISO. The NTO shall comply with maintenance schedules coordinated by the ISO, pursuant to this Agreement, for NTO Transmission Facilities Under ISO Operational Control. The NTO shall be responsible for providing notification of maintenance schedules to the ISO for NTO Transmission Facilities Requiring ISO Notification. The NTO shall provide notification of maintenance schedules to affected Transmission Owners for NTO Transmission Facilities Requiring ISO Notification and Local Area Transmission Facilities pursuant to Section 3.5.3 of the ISO Services Tariff.

  • Switching System Hierarchy and Trunking Requirements For purposes of routing CSTC traffic to Verizon, the subtending arrangements between Verizon Tandem Switches and Verizon End Office Switches shall be the same as the Tandem/End Office subtending arrangements Verizon maintains for the routing of its own or other carriers’ traffic (i.e., traffic will be routed to the appropriate Verizon Tandem subtended by the terminating End Office serving the Verizon Customer). For purposes of routing Verizon traffic to CSTC, the subtending arrangements between CSTC Tandem Switches and CSTC End Office Switches shall be the same as the Tandem/End Office subtending arrangements that CSTC maintains for the routing of its own or other carriers’ traffic.

  • Rotation Where the Employer's designate and the Union's designate at the local level agree that shifts be rotated, the shifts shall be rotated on an equitable basis among the employees involved.

OSZAR »