Potential Impact Sample Clauses

Potential Impact. The proposed project modifications would impact a portion of the Wollok District, a tribal cultural resource within the Sutter County portion of the FRWLP. This impact is discussed in the Final SEIR, in Appendix A, at page 3.17-28.

Potential Impact. Implementation of the Project modifications could result in the loss or disturbance of nesting Xxxxxxxx’x Xxxx and loss of nesting and foraging habitat. This potential impact is discussed in the Draft SEIR at page 3.9-11.

Potential Impact. Construction activities at both the Laurel Avenue and Xxxxxxx Bridge Erosion Repair sites would require ground disturbance, which could result in the potential loss of special-status plant populations through removal of their habitat. This impact is discussed in the Draft SEIR starting at page 3.8-8.

Potential Impact. When dealing with potential impact, there are two complementary issues at stake: 1. The type of impact 2. Who is affected The type of impact is dependent on the specific activities undertaken (e.g. in research planning, or in education) while the people affected depends on both the way the activities are undertaken and the way the results are made available (typically, in some easily accessible concrete persistent form). As we will see in Section 7, Detailed Implementation Plan, the four targeted euCognition activities span the complete spectrum of cognitive systems and the outcome of all activities will be made publicly available in an easily accessible form on the euCognition website. For convenience, the spectrum of cognitive systems is divided into three principal areas: 1) The underlying paradigms of cognition; 2) The scientific development of cognitive systems, including i) Scientific foundations; ii) Functional capabilities of prototypical systems; iii) Application-specific competences, validation scenarios, and future applications. 3) Highly-topical and formative issues. The four targeted activities are: (a) Outreach (b) Scientific Outlook (c) Education (d) On-line Resources for the Community Consequently, the impact that the network will have will include the bridging of disparate communities through outreach (bridging both within sub-disciplines in scientific community and between the scientific community and the public at large), the identification of a solid, broadly-based and consensus-driven research agenda, and the development and promotion of the discipline in all its many guises through the creation of educational material and through the exchange of staff and students among participating member. In this context, special effort will be exerted to build a wide- ranging community that can participate effectively in FP7. Ultimately, our goal as a community is to support the advancement of the scientific understanding and engineering knowledge of natural and artificial cognitive systems to allow them to be deployed in challenging applications. The likelihood of this being achieved will be greatly enhanced through the sharing of current knowledge and the creation of new ideas in the forum provided by euCognition.

Potential Impact. Deficiencies that without correction could become a risk to the health, safety or personal rights of the child(ren).

Potential Impact. Implementation of the Project modifications could result in the loss of wetlands and other waters of the United States. This potential impact is discussed in the Draft SEIR at page 3.8-7.

Potential Impact. The results of the survey highlighted the need for pan-European guidelines to inform clinicians, survivors / families and healthcare systems about LTFU care should be delivered (models of care, transition) and what it should include (surveillance for late adverse effects, health promotion). They have also provided an important baseline to inform subsequent dissemination and implementation of the guidelines across Europe. Clinical practice guidelines for late adverse effects have identified gaps in knowledge of late effects on which to base guidelines. This work will continue and is intended to become the standard for countries to base their surveillance and counselling for late effects. Organisation of LTFU, transition care practices, healthy lifestyle promotion, together with the guidelines offer the opportunity to improve equity of access to LTFU in all European countries. ⮚ We still have a long way to go ⮚ The hard part is now ⮚ Cure is definitely not enough ⮚ Use survivor experiences and keep survivors engaged from an early stage ⮚ We earn from each other ⮚ Don´t underestimate yourself ⮚ Continue to inform all along the way from the beginning of treatment ⮚ Treatment summaries/Passport to empower survivors ⮚ Risk stratification which identify those at risk (few) and those with a small or no increased risk (many) ⮚ Update professionals (e.g. GPs) on social media and other novel means of keeping contact with their patients ⮚ Implement new technologies where possible, e.g. apps to remind/alert survivors about follow-up ⮚ Impart new information to survivors as gently as possible – don’t scare the survivors unnecessarily ⮚ Lobby important stakeholders such as MPs, MEPs, and Health Authorities etc. WP8 has continued to lead the Consortium through multiple web conferences of the Executive Board on a regular basis as well as through physical meetings (General Assemblies) at least twice yearly. WP8 has also been present in most other web conferences related to WP2-5 and WP6 respectively. The web site (xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx) has been constantly updated with new information and new publications. Work with other EU projects such as ENCCA (ended Dec 31, 2015), PanCareLIFE and ExPO-r-Net has been ongoing with the Coordinator from ULUND being present at several if not most of their meetings. This means that common ground between these European projects has gone forward, with significant advances made by all stakeholders.

Potential Impact. Screening studies for coeliac disease (CD) in Europe have revealed prevalence as high as 1.0% and in first-degree relatives of CD patients the frequency of the disease is as common as 10%. Thus, CD has emerged as a new European public health problem. A conservative prevalence of 0.5% corresponds to about 2.5 million CD cases in Europe, out of which about 85% are unrecognised and thus also untreated. In a life perspective the negative health consequences of untreated CD are extensive and considerably reducing the quality of life. The necessary gluten free diet gives an extra cost of € 1,200-1,300 per patient a year, according to an estimate by the Dutch Association of Coeliac Patients (NCV). This corresponds to a total European financial burden of €3.0-3.3 billion, when considering all 2.5 million CD cases. Thus, the negative economical consequences are substantial, with additional expenditure due also to lost working-time and misspent healthcare cost. CD has, until recently, been considered as unavoidable. However, this view was recently challenged by an epidemic of CD among children in the genetically stable Swedish population. Such an epidemic curve of CD incidence indicates an abrupt change in causal factors. Further studies suggest that half of the epidemic might have been prevented if all infants had been introduced to gluten-containing foods gradually and preferably while still breast-fed. If so, it might be that CD could be prevented in millions of Europeans by changes in infant diet practices. Thus, primary prevention might be an option for CD, and this is highly preferable for both humanitarian and economical reasons.

Potential Impact the main dissemination activities and exploitation of results Potential Impact - Summary Impact by Work Package Dissemination Activities

Potential Impact. The Project modifications could result in exceedance of applicable thresholds for construction emissions for ROG, in the FRAQMD. This impact is discussed in the Draft SEIR at page 3.5-10.